How Do I Stop Employees Leaking Data to ChatGPT and AI Tools?

Quick answer: Combine policy (acceptable use for AI), technical controls (DLP, browser controls, network filtering), approved alternatives (enterprise AI with data protection), and training. You can't just block it—people will find workarounds. You need a strategy.

The Problem Is Real

Your employees are using ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and dozens of other AI tools. They're pasting in:

• Customer data
• Financial information
• Source code
• Strategic documents
• Contract details
• HR information

They're not being malicious. They're being productive. But that data is now outside your control, potentially training AI models, and definitely a compliance nightmare.

Why Blocking Doesn't Work

"Just block ChatGPT" sounds simple. Problems:

• New AI tools appear constantly—you can't block them all
• Mobile devices bypass your network controls
• People use personal devices
• Blocking kills legitimate productivity gains
• Shadow AI emerges (people find workarounds)

You need a smarter approach.

The Four-Layer Strategy

1. Policy: Set clear rules

Create an AI acceptable use policy covering:

• Which AI tools are approved
• What data can never go into AI (customer PII, financials, source code, etc.)
• Approval process for new AI tools
• Consequences of violations

Make it clear, not bureaucratic. People need to understand why, not just what.

2. Technical controls: DLP and filtering

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Microsoft Purview and similar tools can:

• Detect sensitive data being pasted into web forms
• Block or warn on policy violations
• Log AI tool usage for audit
• Apply sensitivity labels that follow data

Web filtering

• Block unapproved AI tools
• Allow approved tools through controlled channels
• Log usage for visibility

Browser controls

• Endpoint browser extensions that detect AI tool usage
• Copy/paste controls for sensitive applications
• Session isolation for sensitive work

3. Approved alternatives: Give people safe options

If you just block AI, you get shadow AI. Instead:

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365

• Enterprise data protection
• Doesn't train on your data
• Compliance controls built in
• Works with your existing M365 data

Azure OpenAI Service

• Your data stays in your tenant
• Enterprise security controls
• Compliance certifications

Private AI deployments

• On-premise or private cloud AI
• Complete data control
• Higher cost but maximum protection

Give people tools that work AND protect data.

4. Training: Build awareness

People need to understand:

• Why AI data leakage matters
• What data should never go into public AI
• How to use approved tools safely
• How to anonymise data when AI use is appropriate

Make it practical. "Don't paste customer names—describe the scenario instead."

Quick Wins

Today:

• Add AI tools to your acceptable use policy
• Communicate expectations to staff
• Enable DLP alerts (even if not blocking yet)

This month:

• Deploy Copilot or approved alternative
• Configure web filtering for known AI tools
• Run awareness session on AI data risks

This quarter:

• Full DLP policy enforcement
• AI tool inventory and approval process
• Regular monitoring and reporting

What We Implement

For managed clients, we deploy:

• Microsoft Purview DLP configured for AI data protection
• Defender for Cloud Apps for shadow AI discovery
• Conditional Access controlling AI tool access
• Copilot deployment with proper security configuration
• Monitoring for policy violations

We also help with policy development and training—technical controls without policy just creates frustration.

---

about AI security controls.

---